<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for My Dear Hard Drive</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sebastyne.net/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sebastyne.net</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 01:29:17 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Misunderstood BDSM by Pushhyarag</title>
		<link>http://www.sebastyne.net/2009/01/misunderstood-bdsm/comment-page-1/#comment-11701</link>
		<dc:creator>Pushhyarag</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 17:44:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sebastyne.net/?p=599#comment-11701</guid>
		<description>Based on our discussion, re-reading with an effort to understand your view clearly and close reference to Wikipedia article, I want to make some specific points:

1. I don't think it is actually a case of BDSM misunderstood. throughout the article and in your response to comments, there is no case made out of BDSM being misunderstood either by the dominant or the sub. Both are aware of and understand BDSM; in the case of the dominant [male] it is unwillingness [perceptions of reasons for unwillingness differ between what I said in my first comment and what you believed you heard] whereas for the sub, it is reconciling with the realization that the partner is unwilling ['So the girls leave the topic alone'- as you wrote]. So, it is essentially not practicing BDSM and not as much misunderstanding.

2. At some stage of discussions you made a point that more men do not actually understand BDSM [you asked me whether I understood BDSM]; to this again I have to say, men DO understand and are aware but..more men do not practice it.

3. Couples with good understanding &#38; trust are known to be practicing and enjoying it equally; stats? I have no idea.

4. I would have-if I had written-and since you wrote, if you allowed me to, rephrased the title to "BDSM: Do You Believe and Practice?".

&lt;abbr&gt;&lt;em&gt;Pushhyarags last blog post..&lt;a href="http://www.evolveever.com/2009/01/do-i-deserve-one-yet/"&gt;Do I Deserve One, Yet?&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/abbr&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Based on our discussion, re-reading with an effort to understand your view clearly and close reference to Wikipedia article, I want to make some specific points:</p>
<p>1. I don&#8217;t think it is actually a case of BDSM misunderstood. throughout the article and in your response to comments, there is no case made out of BDSM being misunderstood either by the dominant or the sub. Both are aware of and understand BDSM; in the case of the dominant [male] it is unwillingness [perceptions of reasons for unwillingness differ between what I said in my first comment and what you believed you heard] whereas for the sub, it is reconciling with the realization that the partner is unwilling ['So the girls leave the topic alone'- as you wrote]. So, it is essentially not practicing BDSM and not as much misunderstanding.</p>
<p>2. At some stage of discussions you made a point that more men do not actually understand BDSM [you asked me whether I understood BDSM]; to this again I have to say, men DO understand and are aware but..more men do not practice it.</p>
<p>3. Couples with good understanding &amp; trust are known to be practicing and enjoying it equally; stats? I have no idea.</p>
<p>4. I would have-if I had written-and since you wrote, if you allowed me to, rephrased the title to &#8220;BDSM: Do You Believe and Practice?&#8221;.</p>
<p><abbr><em>Pushhyarags last blog post..<a href="http://www.evolveever.com/2009/01/do-i-deserve-one-yet/">Do I Deserve One, Yet?</a></em></abbr></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Misunderstood BDSM by Sebastyne</title>
		<link>http://www.sebastyne.net/2009/01/misunderstood-bdsm/comment-page-1/#comment-11700</link>
		<dc:creator>Sebastyne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 03:19:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sebastyne.net/?p=599#comment-11700</guid>
		<description>I have to admit I don't quite understand this comment, as we discussed on Skype. I simply don't understand what you wanted to say... But as for my male friend, I know exactly what he meant, as we talked about the issue of BDSM and the various forms, in length. His point, in short was that he had problems accepting the role of a dominant because he thought it would come at the expense of the woman. meaning that while he was dominating in nature, he didn't think any female would &lt;em&gt;really&lt;/em&gt; wish to be dominated in that manner, even though they might accept the role as a porn star or as someone who would say or do ANYTHING to please their men.

Other part of your comment I can get some hold on is this: "When a man is unsure if he could actually dominate his partner knowing she would only feel completely..." and I take issue with the word "could". It's not that he thinks he could not, it's whether or not he &lt;em&gt;should. Is it accepted? Would any female actually enjoy it?&lt;/em&gt;

Okay, maybe I'm way off the main point of your comment. :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to admit I don&#8217;t quite understand this comment, as we discussed on Skype. I simply don&#8217;t understand what you wanted to say&#8230; But as for my male friend, I know exactly what he meant, as we talked about the issue of BDSM and the various forms, in length. His point, in short was that he had problems accepting the role of a dominant because he thought it would come at the expense of the woman. meaning that while he was dominating in nature, he didn&#8217;t think any female would <em>really</em> wish to be dominated in that manner, even though they might accept the role as a porn star or as someone who would say or do ANYTHING to please their men.</p>
<p>Other part of your comment I can get some hold on is this: &#8220;When a man is unsure if he could actually dominate his partner knowing she would only feel completely&#8230;&#8221; and I take issue with the word &#8220;could&#8221;. It&#8217;s not that he thinks he could not, it&#8217;s whether or not he <em>should. Is it accepted? Would any female actually enjoy it?</em></p>
<p>Okay, maybe I&#8217;m way off the main point of your comment. <img src='http://www.sebastyne.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Misunderstood BDSM by Pushhyarag</title>
		<link>http://www.sebastyne.net/2009/01/misunderstood-bdsm/comment-page-1/#comment-11698</link>
		<dc:creator>Pushhyarag</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 18:54:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sebastyne.net/?p=599#comment-11698</guid>
		<description>Sebs, you said this would be weird and were wondering if &#38; what my take could be on this. Weird it is, but I decided to see if I can pick something rational to talk about. Here's the take.

There is overwhelming reason to believe that women actually fantasize being overpowered and dominated while enjoying the feeling of being slaves of their master. But I don't quite think the male friend who told you he did not want to dominate someone actually implied, as with many males, it could tantamount to a challenge to the physical prowess at the moment of getting into the act. The act of sex is a fusion of physical and psychological facets of two people. When a man is unsure if he could actually dominate his partner knowing she would only feel completely won over if he came equal to the task with due prowess, he pretends being modest &#38; considerate. Far from being a mindset among men, I think it is a syndrome. So, more often than not the woman, not being able to live her fanasy derives vicarious enjoyment fantasizing in a vast majority of cases. Some insignificant proportion of couples may however succeed. That's how far I could stretch my restraint to produce a view! . But it is quite possible also that I am way off on the main point in your article as well.

&lt;abbr&gt;&lt;em&gt;Pushhyarags last blog post..&lt;a href="http://www.evolveever.com/2009/01/do-i-deserve-one-yet/"&gt;Do I Deserve One, Yet?&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/abbr&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sebs, you said this would be weird and were wondering if &amp; what my take could be on this. Weird it is, but I decided to see if I can pick something rational to talk about. Here&#8217;s the take.</p>
<p>There is overwhelming reason to believe that women actually fantasize being overpowered and dominated while enjoying the feeling of being slaves of their master. But I don&#8217;t quite think the male friend who told you he did not want to dominate someone actually implied, as with many males, it could tantamount to a challenge to the physical prowess at the moment of getting into the act. The act of sex is a fusion of physical and psychological facets of two people. When a man is unsure if he could actually dominate his partner knowing she would only feel completely won over if he came equal to the task with due prowess, he pretends being modest &amp; considerate. Far from being a mindset among men, I think it is a syndrome. So, more often than not the woman, not being able to live her fanasy derives vicarious enjoyment fantasizing in a vast majority of cases. Some insignificant proportion of couples may however succeed. That&#8217;s how far I could stretch my restraint to produce a view! . But it is quite possible also that I am way off on the main point in your article as well.</p>
<p><abbr><em>Pushhyarags last blog post..<a href="http://www.evolveever.com/2009/01/do-i-deserve-one-yet/">Do I Deserve One, Yet?</a></em></abbr></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Misunderstood BDSM by Sebastyne</title>
		<link>http://www.sebastyne.net/2009/01/misunderstood-bdsm/comment-page-1/#comment-11695</link>
		<dc:creator>Sebastyne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 02:36:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sebastyne.net/?p=599#comment-11695</guid>
		<description>That's good to hear!  - at least people can't blame me for not offering variety; on the same page there's Christmas, Barbies and BDSM all in good harmony and understanding. :D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s good to hear!  - at least people can&#8217;t blame me for not offering variety; on the same page there&#8217;s Christmas, Barbies and BDSM all in good harmony and understanding. <img src='http://www.sebastyne.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Misunderstood BDSM by Tony Single</title>
		<link>http://www.sebastyne.net/2009/01/misunderstood-bdsm/comment-page-1/#comment-11694</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony Single</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 02:14:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sebastyne.net/?p=599#comment-11694</guid>
		<description>Trust me, Sebastyne, this was not a daunting topic for me at all. You write with care and in a responsible manner any way, which says to me that a "taboo" topic like this can be discussed intelligently here. I'd love to see what others may have to say on this. :)

As for the dynamics of BDSM, I think that's the key... trust. You'd have to have an awful lot of trust in each other to make sure none of it gets out of hand. But then, relationships in general are like that. :)

&lt;abbr&gt;&lt;em&gt;Tony Singles last blog post..&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Trottersville/~3/502970917/favourites-of-2008-2-trottersville-93.html"&gt;Favourites of 2008 #2 [Trottersville #93]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/abbr&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Trust me, Sebastyne, this was not a daunting topic for me at all. You write with care and in a responsible manner any way, which says to me that a &#8220;taboo&#8221; topic like this can be discussed intelligently here. I&#8217;d love to see what others may have to say on this. <img src='http://www.sebastyne.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>As for the dynamics of BDSM, I think that&#8217;s the key&#8230; trust. You&#8217;d have to have an awful lot of trust in each other to make sure none of it gets out of hand. But then, relationships in general are like that. <img src='http://www.sebastyne.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
<abbr><em>Tony Singles last blog post..<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Trottersville/~3/502970917/favourites-of-2008-2-trottersville-93.html">Favourites of 2008 #2 [Trottersville #93]</a></em></abbr></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Misunderstood BDSM by Sebastyne</title>
		<link>http://www.sebastyne.net/2009/01/misunderstood-bdsm/comment-page-1/#comment-11693</link>
		<dc:creator>Sebastyne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 01:01:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sebastyne.net/?p=599#comment-11693</guid>
		<description>First: Thank you Tony for still commenting, I was sure nobody would touch this one with a 6 foot pole. :D

The limits are given by the submissive, the scenarios are planned out in advance, (I probably should put that into the post) so the power is always with the sub, even though it seems completely opposite. The limits HAVE to be set by the sub, because everyone is different. Physical pain happens to be a big turn on for some people. I think most of us enjoy some amount of pain, but some like a lot, sometimes things that others would consider being completely intolerable. Stepping on testicles with high heels comes to mind. Some men actually like that! Most couples have an unrelated safe word, like "banana", which is used when the play gets too rough and the sub wants to slow down or end the play. Couples who are into BDSM have a deep trust between them, especially sub toward the master, because the master CAN NEVER HARM the sub, and if he (or she) does, the trust is broken and can be hard to mend.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First: Thank you Tony for still commenting, I was sure nobody would touch this one with a 6 foot pole. <img src='http://www.sebastyne.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>The limits are given by the submissive, the scenarios are planned out in advance, (I probably should put that into the post) so the power is always with the sub, even though it seems completely opposite. The limits HAVE to be set by the sub, because everyone is different. Physical pain happens to be a big turn on for some people. I think most of us enjoy some amount of pain, but some like a lot, sometimes things that others would consider being completely intolerable. Stepping on testicles with high heels comes to mind. Some men actually like that! Most couples have an unrelated safe word, like &#8220;banana&#8221;, which is used when the play gets too rough and the sub wants to slow down or end the play. Couples who are into BDSM have a deep trust between them, especially sub toward the master, because the master CAN NEVER HARM the sub, and if he (or she) does, the trust is broken and can be hard to mend.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Misunderstood BDSM by Tony Single</title>
		<link>http://www.sebastyne.net/2009/01/misunderstood-bdsm/comment-page-1/#comment-11692</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony Single</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 18:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sebastyne.net/?p=599#comment-11692</guid>
		<description>I must confess that I'm one of those guys who just couldn't imagine himself dominating his lovely wife in any way, shape or form. I do, however, think that anything goes (even BDSM) between two consenting adults, although... I wonder if there should be limits. Surely it should stop at inflicting physical pain and violence on each other? Hmmm... I guess I can't quite get my head around this one.

&lt;abbr&gt;&lt;em&gt;Tony Singles last blog post..&lt;a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Trottersville/~3/500545220/favourites-of-2008-1-trottersville-92.html"&gt;Favourites of 2008 #1 [Trottersville #92]&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/abbr&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I must confess that I&#8217;m one of those guys who just couldn&#8217;t imagine himself dominating his lovely wife in any way, shape or form. I do, however, think that anything goes (even BDSM) between two consenting adults, although&#8230; I wonder if there should be limits. Surely it should stop at inflicting physical pain and violence on each other? Hmmm&#8230; I guess I can&#8217;t quite get my head around this one.</p>
<p><abbr><em>Tony Singles last blog post..<a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Trottersville/~3/500545220/favourites-of-2008-1-trottersville-92.html">Favourites of 2008 #1 [Trottersville #92]</a></em></abbr></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The perfect Barbie &#038; Ken by cb</title>
		<link>http://www.sebastyne.net/2009/01/the-perfect-barbie-ken/comment-page-1/#comment-11689</link>
		<dc:creator>cb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 11:12:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sebastyne.net/?p=583#comment-11689</guid>
		<description>I can't wait to see the barbies they come out with this year since it's the 50th anniversary.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t wait to see the barbies they come out with this year since it&#8217;s the 50th anniversary.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The perfect Barbie &#038; Ken by Sebastyne</title>
		<link>http://www.sebastyne.net/2009/01/the-perfect-barbie-ken/comment-page-1/#comment-11687</link>
		<dc:creator>Sebastyne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 01:37:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sebastyne.net/?p=583#comment-11687</guid>
		<description>@ Push - Thank you. :) I do love them a great deal, and I am glad I haven't lost my imagination when I grew up!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Push - Thank you. <img src='http://www.sebastyne.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> I do love them a great deal, and I am glad I haven&#8217;t lost my imagination when I grew up!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The perfect Barbie &#038; Ken by Sebastyne</title>
		<link>http://www.sebastyne.net/2009/01/the-perfect-barbie-ken/comment-page-1/#comment-11686</link>
		<dc:creator>Sebastyne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 01:31:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sebastyne.net/?p=583#comment-11686</guid>
		<description>@Tony Yes, Barbie is based on a doll called Bild Lilli, who was a German cartoon character. She was in fact, a prostitute. Apparently, Ruth Handler, who owned the toy company Mattel, wasn't aware of the doll's back ground at the time, but she thought it was a perfect toy for her daughter, and the perfect basis of a new toy line - and I can't argue with that one! So next time you hear someone being worried about their Son playing dolls and turning gay, tell them not to worry! ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Tony Yes, Barbie is based on a doll called Bild Lilli, who was a German cartoon character. She was in fact, a prostitute. Apparently, Ruth Handler, who owned the toy company Mattel, wasn&#8217;t aware of the doll&#8217;s back ground at the time, but she thought it was a perfect toy for her daughter, and the perfect basis of a new toy line - and I can&#8217;t argue with that one! So next time you hear someone being worried about their Son playing dolls and turning gay, tell them not to worry! <img src='http://www.sebastyne.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
